Get a monitor and contribute to air quality data in your city.
22.2K people follow this city
AIR QUALITY DATA CONTRIBUTORS
Find out more about contributors and data sourcesIndex | Low | ||
Tree pollen | None | ||
Grass pollen | None | ||
Weed pollen | Low |
Weather | Broken clouds |
Temperature | 66.2°F |
Humidity | 57% |
Wind | 17.3 mph |
Pressure | 30.1 inHg |
# | city | US AQI |
---|---|---|
1 | Kelly, Wyoming | 248 |
2 | Three Rivers, Oregon | 182 |
3 | Bend, Oregon | 160 |
4 | Red Bluff, California | 155 |
5 | Klamath Falls, Oregon | 132 |
6 | Deschutes River Woods, Oregon | 124 |
7 | Oakridge, Oregon | 123 |
8 | Maricopa, Arizona | 122 |
9 | Signal Hill, California | 120 |
10 | Anderson, California | 115 |
(Local time)
SEE WORLD AQI RANKING# | station | US AQI |
---|---|---|
1 | Northeast Minneapolis Holland | 75 |
2 | Minneapolis - East Phillips Community | 64 |
3 | Minneapolis - Andersen School | 63 |
4 | Minneapolis - Near Road I-35/I-94 | 62 |
5 | Minneapolis - Lowry Avenue | 57 |
6 | Elliot Park | 56 |
7 | Minneapolis - Bottineau/Marshall Terrace | 56 |
8 | Minneapolis - Pacific Street | 56 |
9 | Kordiak | 55 |
10 | Harrison | 53 |
(Local time)
SEE WORLD AQI RANKINGUS AQI
53
live AQI index
Moderate
Air pollution level | Air quality index | Main pollutant |
---|---|---|
Moderate | 53 US AQI | PM10 |
Pollutants | Concentration | |
---|---|---|
PM2.5 | 9µg/m³ | |
PM10 | 60µg/m³ | |
O3 | 44µg/m³ |
PM2.5
x1.8
PM2.5 concentration in Minneapolis is currently 1.8 times the WHO annual air quality guideline value
Sensitive groups should reduce outdoor exercise | |
Close your windows to avoid dirty outdoor air GET A MONITOR | |
Sensitive groups should wear a mask outdoors GET A MASK | |
Sensitive groups should run an air purifier GET AN AIR PURIFIER |
Day | Pollution level | Weather | Temperature | Wind |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tuesday, Oct 8 | Good 23 AQI US | 69.8° 51.8° | 6.7 mph | |
Wednesday, Oct 9 | Good 34 AQI US | 78.8° 53.6° | 6.7 mph | |
Thursday, Oct 10 | Moderate 61 AQI US | 69.8° 57.2° | 11.2 mph | |
Today | Moderate 53 AQI US | 69.8° 57.2° | 11.2 mph | |
Saturday, Oct 12 | Good 28 AQI US | 62.6° 51.8° | 8.9 mph | |
Sunday, Oct 13 | Good 38 AQI US | 51.8° 42.8° | 15.7 mph | |
Monday, Oct 14 | Good 6 AQI US | 51.8° 37.4° | 8.9 mph | |
Tuesday, Oct 15 | Good 7 AQI US | 53.6° 35.6° | 6.7 mph | |
Wednesday, Oct 16 | Good 7 AQI US | 68° 42.8° | 13.4 mph | |
Thursday, Oct 17 | Good 13 AQI US | 80.6° 57.2° | 17.9 mph |
Interested in hourly forecast? Get the app
Between 2017 and 2019, Minneapolis air quality fared well for the most stringent government air quality measures: daily ozone, daily PM2.5, and annual PM2.5.1 Historical trends further demonstrate that the frequency and severity of ozone and particulate pollution have shown improvements in recent years.
PM2.5 is suspended particulate matter (PM) measuring less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter. Since size is its defining characteristic, PM2.5 can include chemicals, dust, dirt, smoke, soot, pathogens, and other particles of various compositions.
Often, the substance of particulate matter is localized to the area’s emission sources. As a result, some PM2.5 samples may be more dangerous than others, but all have the potential for far-reaching health consequences – because PM2.5 is so small, it can penetrate into the bloodstream when inhaled and travel to all of the body's organs.
In Minneapolis, PM2.5 pollution is the pollutant of greatest concern. While the city meets government standards for both short-term and annual PM2.5, it is important to note that no level of PM2.5 has been shown to be free of health impact. Moreover, PM2.5 levels in the city can exceed the World Health Organization’s (WHO) more stringent standards. The WHO targets an annual PM2.5 concentration no greater than 10 µg/m3.2 In 2020, both January and December averaged monthly concentration values above this standard at 11.2 µg/m3 and 12.1 µg/m3 respectively.
On an annual basis, Minneapolis averaged a PM2.5 concentration of 8.4 µg/m3, ranked as the 6th most polluted city in the state of Minnesota out of 22 cities. The 5 cities that averaged a higher PM2.5 concentration than Minneapolis included:
Ozone is a highly reactive gas pollutant with a high potential for harm when inhaled. It’s known as a “secondary air pollutant” because it is primarily formed in the air (rather than by ground-based sources) when primary pollutants, such as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), react in the presence of heat and UV radiation.
Typically, temperatures above 84°F initiate this chemical reaction between precursor pollutants. In Minneapolis, only July and August commonly experience average temperatures around this threshold, so high ozone events are generally rare.3 Between 2017 and 2019, zero days in Minneapolis averaged ozone levels above 70 ppb.
Air pollution in Minneapolis exhibits seasonal changes. PM2.5 concentrations are roughly two times higher in the winter than in the summer.
To understand this trend, it is important to recognize that measured Minneapolis air quality levels are the result of both local and transported emissions as well as weather conditions that dictate pollution dispersion.
In the winter, the combination of seasonal emissions and weather conditions not ideal for pollution dispersion can elevate PM2.5 concentrations.
Winter-specific emissions in Minneapolis include:
Weather conditions that are not ideal for pollution dispersion include:
While 10 months during the year in Minneapolis typically meet WHO PM2.5 standards (< 10 µg/m3), these standards are frequently breached during December and January (as occurred in 2020) when increased emissions and pollution-trapping weather conditions cause PM2.5 to accumulate faster and reach higher concentration levels.
Minneapolis is the most populous city in the state of Minnesota with a population of 430,000 residents.4 The greater metropolitan area, commonly referred to as the “Twin Cities,” also includes Saint Paul, the state capital located just 9 miles to the west, and spans seven counties: Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott, and Washington. A total of 3,099,000 residents live within this Twin Cities region, accounting for 55% of the state’s total population.
As is common in large urban areas, the majority of Minneapolis’s air pollution originates from gas-powered motor vehicles and domestic sources within the great region.
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency estimates that state-wide emissions can be broken down into the following categories:5
Wildfire smoke blown in from Canada and the Pacific Northwest can also deliver dense plumes of PM2.5. These emissions are typically sporadic and temporary but can cause severe short-term spikes in Minneapolis air pollution levels. Of the 26 air quality alerts since 2015, 14 have been attributed to wildfire smoke.6
In Minnesota, motor vehicles are the leading source of both air pollution emissions and greenhouse gas emissions. Managing this emission source is becoming easier as more “green” transportation options, such as electric vehicles (EVs) and other vehicles powered by alternative fuel like hydrogen, become increasingly affordable and available to the wider public. This represents a major opportunity for Minneapolis and cities around the U.S. to reduce their air pollution levels.
In 2020, Minneapolis made strides towards 100% EV adoption, including:7
These measures intend to achieve the goal of powering 20 percent of light-duty (personal) cars in the state with electricity by 2030.
Every year, 200,000 Americans die from breathing polluted air.8 Even in cities where air quality is generally deemed safe, air pollution can still cause premature mortality and illness. A 2015 study conducted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) found that 6 to 13 percent of Twin Cities deaths were caused by air pollution that meets federal standards.9 Moreover, other health outcomes can still be severe, including:
In Hennepin County, the number of residents living with sensitivities that predispose them to more acute health impacts from air pollution include:
Sometimes, localized emission sources can fail to be captured by city-wide air quality monitors. Traffic pollution, for example, has been found to cause asthma attacks and a broader range of health impacts. People within 300 to 500 meters of a highway have been found to be most impacted.
In the same vein, numerous studies have observed that the burden of air pollution is not evenly shared. People of color (Hispanics, Asians, American Indians/Alaska Natives and especially African Americans) statistically bear a greater health burden when it comes to air quality because they are 61 percent more likely to live in a county with a failing grade for at least one pollutant.1 This is the result of decades of unjust zoning that has, for example, placed airports, highways, and polluting industrial facilities such as factories closer to lower-income communities that more likely to be composed of a diversity of minority groups.
A study of the East Phillips area has revealed that this trend is consistent in the city of Minneapolis. Decades ago, East Phillips was known as the Arsenic Triangle after a pesticide plant contaminated the area.10 Today, local pollution sources include the Bituminous Roadways asphalt plant, Smith Foundry, and surrounding highways. Between 2019 and 2020 alone, average annual PM2.5 has increased in East Phillips by 25 percent.
Four-fifths of East Phillips residents are people of color – 38.2% are Hispanic or Latino, 26.4% are Black or African American, 9.8% are Native American, and at least 5% are Asian, with White residents only comprising 19.1% of the total area population.11 State legislator Karen Clark has thus deemed the issue an environmental justice issue that must urgently be addressed. She has worked to pass legislation that requires new operations in the neighborhood to account for the health impacts of pollution on residents and is now working to uphold these standards.
+ Article Resources
[1] American Lung Association. (2020). State of the air – 2020.
[2] World Health Organization. (2020). Air quality guidelines – global update 2005.
[3] Current Results. (2020). Minneapolis temperatures: averages by month.
[4] Metropolitan Council. (2019, April 18). Steady growth continues in metro area.
[5] Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). (2020). Sources of air pollution.
[6] Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). (2020). Smoky summers the new normal?
[7] Bocklund K. (2021). Looking back: progress made toward transportation electrification in Minnesota in 2020. Drive Electric Minnesota.
[8] Chu J, et al. (2013). Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S. MIT News Office.
[9] Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). (2015). Life and breathe: how air pollution affects the Twin Cities.
[10] Jones J. (2021, April 28). Meet Karen Clark, Minnesota’s trailblazing pollution legislator. Mpls St. Paul.
[11] East Phillips neighborhood data. (2021). Minnesota Compass.
30Contributors
Government Contributor
6 stations
2 Individual Contributors
1 station
1 station
27 Anonymous Contributors
27 stations
4 Data sources