|5||Amakusamachi Takahamaminami, Kumamoto|
|10||Kojima Ekimae, Okayama|
(local time)SEE WORLD AQI RANKING
City AQI based on satellite data. No ground level station currently available in Yokohama.
Be the first to provide air quality data in Yokohama.Become a contributor
7:11, Jun 20
live AQI index
|Air pollution level||Air quality index||Main pollutant|
|Good|| 17 US AQI||PM2.5|
|PM2.5|| 4.1 µg/m³|
PM2.5 concentration in Yokohama air is currently 0 times above WHO exposure recommendation
|Open your windows to bring clean, fresh air indoors|
|Enjoy outdoor activities|
Good 46 US AQI
|Monday, Jun 21|
Moderate 71 US AQI
|Tuesday, Jun 22|
Moderate 63 US AQI
|Wednesday, Jun 23|
Moderate 56 US AQI
|Thursday, Jun 24|
Moderate 57 US AQI
|Friday, Jun 25|
Moderate 60 US AQI
|Saturday, Jun 26|
Moderate 54 US AQI
Interested in hourly forecast? Get the app
Yokohama is a city located in the Kanto region of Japan, just south of Tokyo. It is the second most populous city in the whole country, with some 3.7 million inhabitants living there. It is considered an important commercial hub in the area known as greater Tokyo, with rapid development having taken place during in the last century due to its relevance as a prominent port city.
Looking at its levels of pollution, Yokohama is a city with a respectable level of air quality, although not without some pollutive issues, particularly during certain months of the year. In 2019 it came in with a PM2.5 reading of 10.5 μg/m³, placing it in the lower end of the ‘good’ ratings bracket, which requires a PM2.5 reading of anywhere between 10 to 12 μg/m³ to be classified as such.
This gave it a very fine margin of entry to achieve such a rating, as well as also indicating that Yokohama was only 0.5 units away from moving down into the most optimal group category of 10 μg/m³ or less, which is the World Health Organizations (WHO) target for the best possible quality of air, with readings that verge on the side closer to 0 being the most optimal.
Yokohama’s reading of 10.5 μg/m³ placed it into 2402nd place out of all cities registered around the world, as well as coming in at 362nd place out of all cities in Japan. Hence, it is a city that is privy to good qualities of air for most of the year, with certain months having a few pollutive issues of concern.
With its close proximity to Tokyo, as well as having a large population coupled with a high amount of industry, subsequently Yokohama would have pollution issues related to these activities, with a high volume of anthropogenic (human related) activities taking place that cause the elevations in PM2.5 as seen in certain months of the year, which will be discussed in further detail.
PM2.5 refers to particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers or less in diameter, making them approximately 3% the size of a human hair, and sometimes far smaller, going down to sizes as small as 0.001 microns or less. As such PM2.5 is a major component used in the calculation of overall air quality, due to its severe health consequences when found in high quantities in the air.
The main causes of pollution in Yokohama would be vehicle emissions, with many cars and other personal vehicles such as motorbikes doing their daily commute in the city as well as over to Tokyo, along with heavy duty vehicles such as trucks, lorries and buses all releasing their own higher quantities of pollution, often running on fossil fuels such as diesel. Other pertinent sources of pollution would be emissions from factories, with many still running on coal, which along with the combustion of diesel, adds large amounts of chemical pollutants as well as fine particulate matter into the air.
Observing the data taken over 2019, the months that came in with the worst readings of pollution were in the middle portion of the year, with one prominent spike of PM2.5 being recorded in the earlier months but being somewhat of an abnormality.
Yokohama lacks any distinct massive jumps in pollution levels, as is sometimes seen in some of the more polluted cities across Asia, instead tending towards extended periods of mildly raised air pollution levels. May through to September could be seen as being the ‘most polluted’ period of the year, although every month still fell into the good ratings category, never jumping above 12 μg/m³. Despite these mild times of pollution, they fell outside of the WHO's target goal of 10 μg/m³ or less, and thus can be counted as more polluted, relatively speaking.
The month that came in with the worst overall reading of PM2.5 was in February, with a number of 13.6 μg/m³ being recorded, making it the only month of the year to fall into the ‘moderate’ ratings bracket. This bracket requires a PM2.5 reading of anywhere between 12.1 to 35.4 μg/m³ to be classed as such, and represents a change from where the air quality starts to move up to levels where it may be detrimental to certain demographics of the population.
In contrast to the previous question, the months that came in with the cleanest air quality readings were fairly sporadic, not following any particular pattern as is sometimes the case in cities across Asia, due to seasonal factors or related activities denoting heightened pollution, such as the forest and farmland fires in Indonesia affecting pollution levels in Malaysia, South Thailand and Singapore.
Looking at the data, the months that came in with the cleanest readings of PM2.5 were January, April, October and November, all of which fell within the WHO's target goal of 10 μg/m³ or less. Their readings in order were 8.9 μg/m³, 9.7 μg/m³, 8.6 μg/m³ and 8.7 μg/m³ respectively. This showed that October was the cleanest month by a small margin, with all the aforementioned months coming in with the most optimal qualities of air.
With much of its pollution emanating from sources such as car, lorry and truck fumes, as well as from industrial areas of factories, alongside any industrial effluence being released into the air from whatever item or material is being produced at these factories (for example, factories involved in the production or recycling of plastic items often will inevitably release burnt plastic fumes into the air).
The main pollutants coming from cars would be nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and sulfur dioxide (SO2), with nitrogen dioxide being the most prominent in its release from vehicles, with known side effects being breathlessness in those who are exposed, as well as damage or rapid aging to the lung tissues over longer periods of time, as well as the triggering of respiratory diseases such as asthma, pneumonia or bronchitis.
Other pollutants would be released from factory areas, particularly those running on coal or other fossil fuels, giving off fine particulate matter such as black carbon, as well as volatile organic compounds (VOC's) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Some examples of VOC's would include benzene, formaldehyde and xylene. All are hazardous to human health and very easy to respire, but the most prominent pollutants would be the ones coming from vehicular sources, such as the aforementioned nitrogen and sulfur dioxides.